Showing posts with label comments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label comments. Show all posts

Sunday, August 21, 2016

comments on Surrendering My AIA Prime Life Policy



comments on http://www.turtleinvestor.net/surrendering-my-aia-prime-life-policy/#comment-166284
the NTUC policy has no cash value. 
"For AIA, I’m paying $73.17 monthly for $50k coverage with some riders on it. In comparison, my NTUC Income policy has $200k TPD/CI coverage at $68.90" 
inaccurate calculation. at $73.17 monthly for 20 years, if you assumed the insurance costs was free, the yoy annual rate is about -0.67% 
"Yah ! for the past 20 teays,, you are just getting half of the return if you just invest in STI ETF ,, IRR just around 3.5 % ,,, with your own control ,, money shall double than that in enxt 20 years !!" 
http://shiohmekiah.blogspot.sg/2016/08/comments-on-assi-whole-life-insurance.htmlhttp://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2014/09/whole-life-insurance-universal-life.htmlkenneth chua's comment is particularly insightful.
kevin's policy IS from 1997. 
"We all know that the benefit illustration 20+yrs ago is flawed and XIRR based on my surrender value is about 2.6%. However, bearing in mind that I was 13 then and my parents are not financially savvy – they just hope to give me some form of savings when I grow up, I can live with it. If XIRR can increase to 3% when I reach the 30th policy year, coupled with the insurance coverage, – I will be contented." 
always a good habit. I do so for mine too. 
"At the halfway mark in 2008 when I started working, I began collecting these annual letters as much as I could, and I can see that the projected surrender value was revised downwards." 
freaking ****!
the plague of one size fits all.
freaking employee fund manager mentality! just protect his own rice bowl! 
"72% in fixed income20% in equities3% in real estate3% in other assets2% in loans" 
looks about right but that 2012 to 2016 is just wrong.
see above comment. 
"Year 1997 : $21,385Year 2008 : $17,544Year 2010 : $15,718Year 2012 : $16,448Year 2016 : $16,449" 
good timing now though if it is 72% fixed income! 
"I was told have to wait to next year, because the value at that point in time can fluctuate according to the underlying fund returns. Oh well."

comments on assi - Whole life insurance, universal life insurance and investing

comments on http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2014/09/whole-life-insurance-universal-life.html
that kenneth chua comment in 2014 is a very perceptive and insider comment.
I made extensive and intensive studies on my own whole life policies so I know that was a very good important comment. and most people won't understand it.

universal life insurance as it is marketed in Singapore, in this environment, is poison.
and ak, his question is not what you think it is.
"I don't think Universal Life Insurance is well known in Singapore and to me, it is just a more flexible form of Whole Life Insurance. "

kenneth chua's comments in 2014:


Kenneth Chua said...
Hi AK,

I chanced upon your blog this year and is impressed by your insights into the various financial topics. (Errh on oats as lunch occasionally yes, but not everyday..its quite filling :)

What works in the past for traditional whole life and endowment policies are not achievable now in the low interest rate environment. Your policy and mine are of different series of the same product (Prime Life). Thus, surrender value differs by about 15K. Life coverage is high with corresponding low premiums in the past. It was a struggle especially in early years paying the premiums for multiple policies. Hence, at age 65, it will be nice to surrender one or two policies at highest surrender value. However, it will be good too to keep these policies for your descendants as a gift.(Properties are a more preferable choice obviously..hehe..).

Current whole life policies offered don't even meet the inflation rate. The worst advice received is to purchase ILPs in order to increase the returns with wrong objective of insurance coverage vs investment returns. Thus, I don't encourage anyone to purchase whole life policies nowsaday.


20 Aug '2016

AK71 said...
From my FB account:

Reader:

Hi AK,

A friend recently suggested getting Universal Life Insurance policy, taking a loan to pay part of the premium & service the interest only of the loan. The benefits highlighted is akin to getting high value Term Insurance coverage but with added benefit of cash value growth (i.e. form of wealth accumulation). Would you have a conversation with yourself on the value/risk of Universal Life policy and the circumstance that it might be suited for?

Thank you in advance πŸ™‚


AK:
I don't think Universal Life Insurance is well known in Singapore and to me, it is just a more flexible form of Whole Life Insurance.

"You have the liberty to reduce or increase your death benefit and also to pay your premiums at any time and in any amount (subject to certain limits) after your first premium payment has been made." INVESTOPEDIA

It is still more costly than term life insurance as it includes elements of savings and investment. So, if you believe in not mixing up insurance and investment, this is not going to fly. πŸ˜‰

comment on Scolded by wife for thinking about financial freedom

thinking further, the assi reader is not scolded for thinking about financial freedom but for not having the aspirations and looking to escape.


my personal opinion is both sides (only investing/career matters) are equally extreme.
though to be equally focused on both is an art in itself.
nothing wrong to have aspirations on both fronts.
but the more important thing I would ask myself is: are my reasons behind investing more aspirational or more of an escape?
and very often, for a lot of people, they find it to be the latter.
if we find that to be the case that we are looking to escape, then we need to question our mentality.
i find it important to find the courage not to back away from challenges.

Saturday, August 20, 2016

tax relief is free money comment at assi

at 20%, tax relief is free money. free money NOW.

as long as cash flow is good.

upcoming comment at http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2016/08/why-worry-about-hitting-cpf-ms-frs-too.html

Thus, slowing down or stopping OA to SA transfer might be a good idea if tax benefit from MS Top Up to SA is something that is important to you.

Sunday, August 7, 2016

comments on Rolf’s View of the World and Singapore’s Economy – The whole world has been leveraging up! (Part 3)

comments on: http://www.rolfsuey.com/2016/08/rolfs-view-of-world-and-singapores.html?showComment=1470506201574#c4614877967689040021

not an inapt comparison.

"Imagine you held currencies worth US$35 since 1970. Fast forward more than 40 years today, while the paper US$35 currencies are still the same dollar notes, the purchasing power of the currencies have fallen dramatically.  In retrospect, if you bought 1 ounce of gold in 1970 which cost US$35, the dollar value of that ounce of gold is worth US$1,350 at present time. This is a whopping increase of >38 times."

and you see the effect on longer dated bond prices.

During the GFC, QEs were used to acquire assets of longer maturity as well as the distressed mortgage backed securities from US government sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, thereby lowering longer-term interest rates. Thanks to QE1 implemented in Nov 2008, just one year after the worst crisis since Depression, business remarkably went back to usual. Subsequently, QE2 took place in Nov 2010, followed by QE3 in Sep 2012. 

it will require coordinated central banks together with coordinated fiscal policies.

Janet Yellen, the current Fed chairwoman was left behind an enormous public debt problem in US today (~19 trillions) that I reckon there is no way she can turn back, but to continue the artificial support of the world’s economy. It is possible that any major tightening of money supply will possibly lead to collapse of the entire market. 

for the personal, just simply reduce your debts.
but the interesting immediate consequences of a gradual rate hike is the effect of this on currencies and trade balances.
as of now, it seems while EU and BOJ haven't abandoned their monetary stimuli, the Fed will continue to hold off any rate hike.
BOJ's recent action has caused a noticeable reaction on long dated treasuries.

When debt becomes so huge, even a less than substantial increase in borrowing rate can bring about significant interest repayments.  

productivity growth can no longer lead to jobs and higher income due to technology.
it may become more relevant again with higher acceleration of consumption demand.
consumption demand by itself will not help much, only acceleration of its growth will.
productivity growth is an old metric. and i suspect increasingly irrelevant.

Recently he also discussed the biggest worries in US now is the low productivity growth that will eventually lead to economic stagnation particularly in most developed OECD countries.  

i believe this stimulus disappointment was the best move by BOJ at this current juncture due to previous stimulus moves resulting in higher yen.
http://shiohmekiah.blogspot.com/2016/08/boj-buying-up-japanese-etfs-and.html
the problem with Japan is a mentality problem that won't go away easily.
but demographics are changing and the younger guard are bringing back some energy and new ideas and new changes.
it will take time though.

Just recently, PM Abe had announce another round, >28 trillions yen ($265b) of stimulus. However its effectiveness remains to be seen. Many suspect if this strategy is to fail, Japan may need more dramatic strategy ahead, such as "helicopter money"! 

surprisingly, I think the cheap devaluation of GBP and EUR (without spending upfront money, they may pay for it with legislation and restructuring of economic policies later on) has given them some help. we may see this positive aid in figures later this year granted confidence hasn't totally abandoned EU with the recent bank stocks collapses and being kicked out of STOXX and the recent terror attacks and the recent migration of more elites from Europe to US and other countries.
the problem with europe is long term and cannot be solved easily.
They will still do better as a trading bloc but it is not so simple; binding one size fits all legislation, binding currencies out of sync with the economies, tyranny of the majority votes in EU, conflicting interests.
they can do better with a looser structure but the EUR is important for them.

The recent Brexit does not bode well for the EU. About half of UK imports come from EU. In particular France and Germany are UK largest trading partners after the U.S. Brexit also further dampened the solidarity in EU.  Already cohesiveness is low because the core economies do not like the idea that they need to support the countries that cannot pay their bills, which includes Greece, Portugal, Spain, Ireland and Cyprus who defaulted resulted in the Euro Debt crisis after the GFC.

China has devalued this year too.
but comparatively, they are quite nice already. they didn't devalued too much.
even given their long transition pains from export to self sustainable economy.
they are already being nice to global community so far.

Sunday, July 31, 2016

comments on ak Saving money with good deals is common sense but...

https://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2016/07/saving-money-with-good-deals-is-common.html
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7944902213075756335&postID=51588254263444376&page=1


how about buying a property right now in July 2016 with a lump sum (via a loan with interest) and collect future rentals? 
Question: If the supermarket told you that you could buy more of a special deal item but you could only collect one now and the rest on a monthly basis in future, would you bite?  

comments on smol Equities and Bonds can't be both right. Right?



long duration fixed income investors moving to short term to lower their risk in recent times. you can't change the spots on leopards, fixed income investors will always prefer fixed income. and then there's the positioning by funds too. when even the old and new bond kings go bearish on longer duration bonds, you know there is just one last attempt to hit the highs.
if you are confused by the above paragraph, I have posted some hastily written articles. or you can just google for the info.
some nice stuff there smol.
"With 30 year bonds yielding so low, in the days of old, short term treasuries will be yielding much higher to give an inverted yield curve."


abe and kuroda playing pingpong. neither wants to be responsible.
seriously, time is running out for these deflationary markets.
time to bring on the fiscal spending bazooka.
else it's not just changes in the monetary policy environments,
it's the change in public political sentiments!
"Let's see whether Japan got the guts to be the first country to experiment with "helicopter money" this week."


half the bonds out there in the DM world are negative yielding.
"11 trillions of sovereign bonds globally are now in negative yield. Who owns these bonds? "


nice. correlations work.... until they don't. a nice example is the recent decoupling between oil and us equities.
"Corelation between asset classes change all the time. During GFC, asset classes that have low co-relation become highly co-related. I think not all bonds are created equal."


devaluation of renminbi. right now, it's businesses and asset plays, not just properties.
"You think why rich mainland Chinese are bidding up properties in Canada, Australia, HK, and Singapore?"


how soon? no idea. is there coordination between CBs? no idea.
"Now, when the music stop and central bank start to drain the water back, which glasses will be emptied first and which glass will not be completely emptied?"


haha. a standard idea sold to people who don't know what to do.
"All these years, I've been told to hold both bonds and equities to take advantage when either asset class drops."


nope. SGD is extremely teng (tough to chew) at the moment still. but other currencies are dropping.
"But what am I suppose to do now when both are rising? Both are rising due to increase liquidity cause by QE right? Does this mean that the value of my cash holdings will fall due to inflation?"


is that a leading question? lol
" In that case, am I suppose to buy some precious metal to protect the value?"


what do you think of that, TI?
" Or will it be better to get some ETF to ride on the liquidity wave? Wouldn't this QE bubble burst anytime? It's doesn't make sense to keep printing when it's not back by any assets except our confidence in the paper right?"


that's your reaction? so funny lol and no, i am not making fun of you.
"Why are there so much considerations? Not passive at all leh! ζˆ‘θ’«ιͺ—δΊ†"


i imagine it is tough. the risk is so high.
"I tell you, it cannot be fun to be money managers working for pension funds or insurance companies right now.How to secure the "promised" income for your pensioners and policy holders when 10 year US treasury is yielding below 2%???"


somemore still got people recommending crowd funding leh. I see the 13.5% yield on Epicentre for $1m and I go huh? why the management of Epicentre do this? do they need it? what's their vested stake? somemore got so many promoters woh. what are they earning?
"3) Small time newbie "ah longs" losing their money in peer-to-peer lending..."


they go by tranches. the ones where yields are guaranteed means they already bought them. and if the prices go up, they sell to lock in the promised yields and get some float. It's really the mark to market ones that are scary.
by my reckoning, some 'accredited investors' are going to get some real accreditations.
"If it's institutions then quite cham, can't worm their way out of the "promised guaranteed plus chop capital protected with variable bonus interest else my banking hall let you burn" investment that they have sold to their clients, without fearing that these investments will go up in smoke IF the party ends (honestly I think few really knows which direction the market will trend now right?)."


so long ago. such a dangerous time then.
"In the past, where need to invest. Just save put in the bank double digit interest compound. Where got all the rubbish of 5-6% return portfolio per year that we are all shouting now from our portfolio. "


they charge, bank run, lower reserve, unlawful. so they also forced to find yield. else unprofitable, bank selloff. see european banks. it's fun so far.
"Then now negative interest which is the central bank preventing commercial bank to hold money but instead lend it all out. Bank will never charge consumer negative interest. "


I always maintained bonds have the same risk as stocks.
risk is defined as permanent loss of capital.
the volatility is different, that's all.
"" Don’t forget that bond prices crashed in late 2008, and many stopped paying dividends."


lol are you positioned?
"In investing, its all about positioning - before the event happens."


don't like that. lol
they doing their best already.
I don't know about their market knowledge of all these current batch.
(LHL and tharman are really smart people though.)
but they did put in their heart. even upped the CPF RA rates via a tiered system.
I just hope they are not eating into reserves again. (I am a miser.)
and not squeezing juice out of the GIC rock.
forcing people an impossible target sometimes result in disasterous consequences.
"Those of us who worked in corporate and experienced a top management change would appreciate.Promises made by the previous management to you become words written on water :("


nice.
"Just look at ASEAN - how many are run by the military in the background? So far so good? That's because we have a BIG STICK!"


gan en
"If I look at Taiwan and HK for the past 10 years; and Japan for the past 30 years... I am just grateful how life has turned out for me and my family."